ilProphet
09-19-2007, 11:40 PM
if a site doesnt pass the w3c validator, is it definitely not compliant, just curious before i tell someone that there site isnt compliant
|
Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : how accurate is w3c validator ilProphet 09-19-2007, 11:40 PM if a site doesnt pass the w3c validator, is it definitely not compliant, just curious before i tell someone that there site isnt compliant Kravvitz 09-20-2007, 02:45 AM It does have a few bugs. There are a few things it misses. If you posted a link, we could take a look at the page. P.S. This is not an accessibility question. :p LeeU 09-20-2007, 10:21 AM Moved to a better-suited forum ... ilProphet 09-20-2007, 01:47 PM i thought standards compliance were in part for accessibility? LeeU 09-20-2007, 02:41 PM Not necessarily. There are many things that won't pass the W3 validator that wouldn't hinder accessibility, and vice-versa. ray326 09-21-2007, 05:15 PM There are accessibility validators out there, too. Basically, semantic mark up is more important than pure HTML/CSS validity. Robert Wellock 10-01-2007, 02:01 PM Adhering to the formal grammars is part of the WCAG. webdeveloper.com
Copyright WebMediaBrands Inc., All Rights Reserved. |