opifex
10-06-2008, 04:04 PM
... and what is the general consensus?
I had been waiting for the 2.0 release as I plan to integrate Mono (http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page) into the curriculum so I can please the powers that be (IT is under the Math Department!) who think that Windows Server is the only viable server option.
I had played with the older 1.2.x releases and it seems to be a reasonable approach to a cross-platform .NET framework. Let's face the facts, Microsoft does produce a lot of good ideas... but within the constraints of the MS Box.
Many .NET applications are really useful and it would be an advantage to any programmer to be able to combine the advantages of LAMPS (or OS X, Solaris, BSD) with the power of some of the .NET apps.
Well, that's my point of view.
I have downloaded, but won't install on test servers until the weekend.
Well...?
I had been waiting for the 2.0 release as I plan to integrate Mono (http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page) into the curriculum so I can please the powers that be (IT is under the Math Department!) who think that Windows Server is the only viable server option.
I had played with the older 1.2.x releases and it seems to be a reasonable approach to a cross-platform .NET framework. Let's face the facts, Microsoft does produce a lot of good ideas... but within the constraints of the MS Box.
Many .NET applications are really useful and it would be an advantage to any programmer to be able to combine the advantages of LAMPS (or OS X, Solaris, BSD) with the power of some of the .NET apps.
Well, that's my point of view.
I have downloaded, but won't install on test servers until the weekend.
Well...?