\\.\
11-22-2008, 07:55 AM
Having watched a well known US TV show that was recently aired, the reference to Escher and one of his works was mentioned.
So I went looking for an online copy that I could get a look at.
In the TV show it briefly shows the work in its proper orientation, the online version I looked at was actually upside down.
What I did notice was that when I saw the TV version in its proper orientation, the first image I saw was a Black Devil but the online version that was upside down I saw a White Angel.
This picture is meant to give you an insight into your way of thinking but given that I was presented two versions of the same works but each one rotated by 180° made me think that theirs a flaw in the concept.
I have been searching for an online reference to any meaning to this but all I find are Universities who mention the works but never explain what it means, they all appear to focus on the geometric and mathematical aspect of the drawing but not what the artist was trying to illustrate.
Why? Well if it is all down to orientation and how the work is displayed to the viewer, then the outcome can be affected by this and any meaning derived from this is void.
What do you think?
So I went looking for an online copy that I could get a look at.
In the TV show it briefly shows the work in its proper orientation, the online version I looked at was actually upside down.
What I did notice was that when I saw the TV version in its proper orientation, the first image I saw was a Black Devil but the online version that was upside down I saw a White Angel.
This picture is meant to give you an insight into your way of thinking but given that I was presented two versions of the same works but each one rotated by 180° made me think that theirs a flaw in the concept.
I have been searching for an online reference to any meaning to this but all I find are Universities who mention the works but never explain what it means, they all appear to focus on the geometric and mathematical aspect of the drawing but not what the artist was trying to illustrate.
Why? Well if it is all down to orientation and how the work is displayed to the viewer, then the outcome can be affected by this and any meaning derived from this is void.
What do you think?