jfletcher
03-04-2009, 11:14 AM
I'm going to start integrating audio on my blog. Mostly they will be interviews of 3 to 10 minutes, and I'm trying to determine the best format to do this in terms of
-sound quality
-file size
-user accessibility
I did one little test here (http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/03/frandsen-talks/). I just used an mp3 for the file with a simple embed tag. I really liked the way it worked, with the little sound bar, but apparently 27 percent of the users who responded to my poll said the sound didn't work for them. It would have helped if some of them had told me what didn't work, but they didn't.
So a few questions...
1. Should I use a different player? I was reading here (http://www.w3schools.com/media/media_object.asp) about using the object command to specify a different player.
2. Should i use a different file type? All my interviews are recorded as .wma, but I was planning to convert them to .mp3 because I figured that was more widely accessible and the file size would be smaller. Am I wrong about that?
3. If I have a longer interview I want to play, and I really don't want to use up 20MB of my web space, which format is best to really compress the file size while maintaining decent quality? (Again, it's not music, so doesn't have to be pristine.)
Thanks for your help!
-sound quality
-file size
-user accessibility
I did one little test here (http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/03/frandsen-talks/). I just used an mp3 for the file with a simple embed tag. I really liked the way it worked, with the little sound bar, but apparently 27 percent of the users who responded to my poll said the sound didn't work for them. It would have helped if some of them had told me what didn't work, but they didn't.
So a few questions...
1. Should I use a different player? I was reading here (http://www.w3schools.com/media/media_object.asp) about using the object command to specify a different player.
2. Should i use a different file type? All my interviews are recorded as .wma, but I was planning to convert them to .mp3 because I figured that was more widely accessible and the file size would be smaller. Am I wrong about that?
3. If I have a longer interview I want to play, and I really don't want to use up 20MB of my web space, which format is best to really compress the file size while maintaining decent quality? (Again, it's not music, so doesn't have to be pristine.)
Thanks for your help!