Can someone review my website?

[ScAndal]

I'm looking at redoing my website and I would like to ask the experts to give some critique on this mockup:

http://www.kineticmedia.net/mockup/index.html

Here is the old site: http://www.kineticmedia.net

Thanks guys/gals

ScAndal

[PeOfEo]

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//www.kineticmedia.net/mockup/index.html
alt attributes would clean this up a whole lot. For background and margins use css.

[ray326]

I like the design but I don't like the implimentation. I believe a modern (non-table) layout would reduce the page size considerably and the HTML doesn't validate.

[ScAndal]

Thanks for the remarks. I agree with all of these and will work on them.

Is there anything with the look of the site that bothers anyone? Too much whitespace?

Any ideas how I could enhance the logo?

ScAndal

[The Cheat]

i would use the <p> (http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_p.asp) tag for your paragraphs and i would definitely use the <h1> (http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_hn.asp) (h1-h6) tags on certain places on your website.

[Sam]

there is a lot of white space @ 1280x1024, mainly because there isn't much vertical content. The news page however, looks quite nice at higher resolution

[PeOfEo]

But even though high res has white space it still does not fit on 800 x 600, I get a small h scroll bar when I resize the window to 800 x 600.

[ScAndal]

Great Catch PeOfEo!

[PeOfEo]

Originally posted by ScAndal
Great Catch PeOfEo! In my opion the best layouts are fluid and the will meet any resolution. Though designing for 800 x 600 is a good alternative because atleast no one is going to have an h scroll bar. (well 640 x 480 will, but that is acceptable, I draw the line at 800 x 600 because anything lower has practically no users.)

[IncaWarrior]

and anyone with a lower resolution will have trouble loading the page in general