plz review semanticat.com

[Ivan FXS]

I'll appreciate expert views on SemantiCat (http://semanticat.com/) project.

[the tree]

I'm sure it wouldn't hurt to use semantic markup, drop the font tags, drop the line breaks, markup table headers as so and get validated (http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http://semanticat.com/).
Some description would be helpful, and I'm sure we could live without default font styles.
There's a typo somewhere that's putting \s into your URLs, probably worth fixing.

What type of server side process are you using? I can see that you've got PHP and Perl avaliable but you've hidden which one your using. Is a database involved?

[JDM71488]

yeah, a database would allow you 1 or 2 pages... you are going to hear a lot about correct markup, that being using lists and styling them the way you want, and with your site, it wouldn't be hard at all... etc.

are you using a database currently? or what? what is this site for anyways? which words can relate to each other?

[Ivan FXS]

I'll surely agree that my style is awful as I'm not a webmaster at all.

To the matter. There is neither "server side process" at all. Site is pure HTML. Database is used in off line and it is MS Access.

What for. It is experimental project to launch semantic net based service.

The net is build on association between words in some specific content.