moondance
04-14-2003, 03:23 PM
this might be a fairly obvious question, but....
I have a site with thumnails of pictures. When the user clicks on one, it opens full size in a new window using javascript.
I was wondering if its quicker to load the page, if the thumbnails are smaller versions of the picture that i've resized in photoshop, or if i use the fully sized picture, and make the thumbnail using the standard HTML way of resizing them.
So does it take longer to load a big image, and resize it into a small one, than it does to load a small graphic, then load another, fully sized one?
mmmmmmm i'd best shut up now cos i'm going round the houses.
I have a site with thumnails of pictures. When the user clicks on one, it opens full size in a new window using javascript.
I was wondering if its quicker to load the page, if the thumbnails are smaller versions of the picture that i've resized in photoshop, or if i use the fully sized picture, and make the thumbnail using the standard HTML way of resizing them.
So does it take longer to load a big image, and resize it into a small one, than it does to load a small graphic, then load another, fully sized one?
mmmmmmm i'd best shut up now cos i'm going round the houses.