I depends to some extent on how many images you have on a page. If it's not too many, say up 50 - 60, then I would resize the images to thumbnail size on the fly and only store the enlarged images...
You're the one who chose to cowardly tell a blatant lie and I have a copy of the post to prove it. You've got only yourself to blame for me highlighting it on other websites and how it might reflect...
Like I said, you're entitled to a view just like I and everyone else is, but personally I have never taken the views of liars and cowards seriously so I'm not going to start now with yours :)
no problem :). I have labelled you a coward and liar and used your post as proof. Everyone else on other websites can then make up their own minds on whether you are a cowardly liar or not.
A lot of people just stick their heads in the sand when told that html5 is still in development and will be for quite a few years yet. Consequently browser support for it varies greatly between the...
If you like the rigidity of xhtml's structural rules then there is nothing wrong with using xhtml. Apart from that there probably isn't a valid reason for using it. But I always use it because I...
The code I posted rotates the images in the array through a single <img> with the next/previous links. Perhaps if you post your html and/or describe why...
