Search:

Hello all,

https://github.com/arvgta/history/issues/2

The plugin itself is making progress, but this bug is nasty.

You can reproduce the bug by navigating to some URLs containing a hash in...

Thanks to both of you!

I have opted for Wordpress, as it is higher-level:

http://4nf.org/

What do you think?

Hello all,

I need your advice as professional web developers, which I'm not quite yet ;-)

This is my current website: http://4nf.org/
It's hosted on a 1&1 web host in Germany.
I'm quite happy...

Thanks very much to all of you!

So the bottom line is, that search engines don't encourage such practices and it is probably against Google Guidelines, right?

I was surprised, that while...

Hello all,

For ages now, I've been developing a tool / jQuery plugin that has certain features, not worth mentioning in this thread.
I'm now contemplating on trashing vast parts of it, except one...

Hello all,

I have added some more documentation on:

- https://gist.github.com/4017712
- http://4nf.org/history-api/

Please see also: https://forum.jquery.com/topic/new-plugin-history-api
...

Hello all,

I've completely overhauled the plugin code: http://4nf.org/history.js

You can now call it this way:


$(document).ready(function(){
$("#content, #nav").history({...

Hi rnd_me,

Thanks very much for you incredible feedback! It's amazing, to which lengths you've gone and how much R&D was involved.
Very nice of you, to open up the code to the public. I suppose...

Hi rnd_me,

Thanks for the overwhelming reply!

I agree: the most elegant and perfect jQuery plugin would ideally just allow you to call the given interface generically and always work...

Hi rnd_me,

the easy bit first - no JQuery "ready" does not get fired again.
Instead, there is functionality for a callback function and/or bespoke event that is triggered on content div load.
...

see also: https://forum.jquery.com/topic/new-plugin-history-api

In this context, I have also created this GIST:


A jQuery encapsulation of the HTML5 History API

Any feedback of any sort?

Hello all,

I've written this new plugin, which encapsulates the HTML5 History API:

http://4nf.org/history/


What do you think?

Works on the sites I control, one of which includes other jQuery libraries.
Just wondering whether it's compatible with heavy duty jQuery sites and/or such that use Prototype simultaneously.

It's...

Hello all,

got this tiny piece of code:

http://4nf.org/GA.js

You can't be careful enought these days...
Can you spot an error?

Any help is greatly appreciated, as I'm an absolute...

The plugin is just being tested now:

http://forum.jquery.com/topic/new-plugin-google-analytics-substitution

see also:

http://forum.jquery.com/topic/new-plugin-google-analytics-substitution

and

http://www.htmlforums.com/client-side-scripting/t-new-plugin-google-analytics-substitution-149356.html

Here's the current market leader: http://www.shamasis.net/projects/ga/

I personally think my solution is even more elegant and consequent, because you have no HTML or JS on your page at all.
...

Hi all,

I've created this little plugin:

http://4nf.org/GA/

What do you think?

Thanks Charles!

I'll live with the error. After all, in another thread I was told not to worship the validator too much.

It also works in all browsers anyway, so I'm easy then.

Thanks! Much appreciated.

a noscript in the head results in 3 errors instead of 1.
Sure, I've tried it before.

According to W3, noscript belongs in the body.

Charles, it they expect a...

Nope, your (conservative) architecture is cool.
Fancy validating Facebook's page, or Google's for the matter?

Let's get constructive:

Any reasonable workaround for the above (and very useful...

...or better to say, forget what URL - it's beside the point:

<noscript><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; URL=..." /></noscript>

Well, not exactly trivial, what we're all doing:


<noscript><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; URL=http://4nf.org/bo.php?u=http://4nf.org/" /></noscript>

Is there any way, to make this...

Hi Criterion9,

just in the case of Google, it seems it spiders both the condensed and the elaborate versions...

Google likes content, I suppose!