www.webdeveloper.com
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Please Review BoysJoys.COM

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4

    Lightbulb Please Review BoysJoys.COM

    hi,
    please review my site www.boysjoys.com

    give me any -ive or +ive comments as you feels about it

    and please suggest me some ideas to improve my site design and to make site better for users


    thankyou

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    26
    Looking nice design and useful content for every one hope you will got more promotion after this updating from google,But with my point of view your website must have need seo ,if you have need seo services pm me ,i will provide in cheap rates with 100% results.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    834
    Site name had me expecting a gay porn site. That could be shooting yourself in the foot before people even THINK about clicking on a link to the site.

    The illegible serif fonts on that top menu, goofy use of bandwidth wasting WAY too thin webfonts, and fixed metric (px) fonts really doesn't make for good usability. The content feels just kinda slapped in there any old way with no rhyme nor reason ... while the fixed width layout with zero responsiveness makes it feel more like "it came from the '90's" than a new or modern site.

    I'd also really look at getting consistent padding and margins on things -- It just feels like values were chosen section-by-section at random with no real layout plan.

    That goofy fixed position "feedback" thing on the side overlapping the content isn't all that great an idea either, particularly when it covers up the menu.

    The page load time is PAINFULLY slow, a little over a minute here because of the really high ping time to your hosting from here (500ms+) and the ridiculous 116 separatie files used to build that page. That it seems to be loading 95 separate images really isn't good. You've just got WAY too much image crap on the page in too many sections where NONE of it seems like related content.

    Under the hood, the broken heading orders and little if anything resembling semantics really isn't helping matters. You've got a bunch of H2, where's your H1... Are you really sure that "Quotes Of The Day", "Facebook Covers", and "SMS Of The Day" are subsections (what H3 means after a H2) of "Wallpapers"? I don't think so. It's knee deep in "javaScript for nothing" and really... well, to be frank with you the very first line of code says most of what's wrong with it:

    Transitional

    Which is to say, in transition from 1997 to 1998 coding practices. It's chock full of outdated methodologies, broken coding methods, and generally speaking needs to be tossed and started over.

    I would suggest axing a two-thirds to three-quarters the images on that home page -- you're doing more with that to drive people away than to draw them in. Maybe... two or three items from each category instead of dozens -- people want to see more, redirect them to a sub-page.

    Really, it's got problems -- problems in accessibility, problems in total page sizes, and problems in the code.
    Java is to JavaScript as Ham is to Hamburger.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    201
    It is true that it takes too much time to fully load the page. Please try to make some modifications to increase page loading time.
    I can never gain something without losing everything I had before.
    ― Nadia Scrieva, Fathoms of Forgiveness | 12BET

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4
    thank you for your valuable reply i will check loading time thing

    thankyou deathshadow for noted little things

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
HTML5 Development Center



Recent Articles