dcsimg
www.webdeveloper.com
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Having trouble with regular validation

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    7

    Having trouble with regular validation

    I am planning on making all of our department's web pages accessible, but I am having a bit of trouble getting the page to validate on the W3C validator. I read that getting the page to HMTL or XHTML validate is the first step in accessibility. --- The home page (and web site) I maintain is at: http://www.houstontx.gov/health/index.html -- when I run this through the validator on HTML transitional 4.0 - I get 8 errors. On XHTML, I get 72 errors! I can only imagine what the Bobby validator will say. Maybe I should get some html or xhtml training - what is confusing me the most is deprecated attributes - bordercolor sounds fine to me but I guess it's not right. -- I participated with AIR Houston - an internet accessibility rally. You can read about it on knowbility.org web site. thanks
    are there any classes on just hmtl and css and html? thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Ankh-Morpork
    Posts
    19,623
    Start with the idea of using [X]HTML to mark up the meaning of your document, not the appearance. Then use CSS styling -- whether via external style sheets, style blocks in the HEAD section, and/or inline style attributes -- to control the appearance of the page.

    To this end, the w3.org specifications for [X]HTML have now deprecated most elements and attributes which were used to control appearance in order to support the idea of using CSS for that.

    If you browse the CSS forum here, you will find a number of good (and some perhaps not so good) links to learning sites and books. As you go through the learning process, keep referring to the relative parts of the specifications at w3.org (see below) so that you learn to read and interpret them. Once you become comfortable working with those spec.'s, which are the ultimate reference source (though not the most user-friendly), you'll be less dependent on others' interpretations of them.

    HTML Spec.
    CSS Spec.
    "Please give us a simple answer, so that we don't have to think, because if we think, we might find answers that don't fit the way we want the world to be."
    ~ Terry Pratchett in Nation

    eBookworm.us

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Alicante (Spain)
    Posts
    7,742
    Just a couple of things: First you have some very major errors in your mark-up. for example, tags in inappropriate places. Your inline css for example is not contained with the <head> tags as it should be. The other problem is you are using <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> but your mark-up looks like Proprietary. It contains things such as NAME, BORDERCOLOR, ALIGN, ABSMIDDLE Which should be dealt with in css in HTML 4.01 Transitional. Also the form tag <form name="guideform" id="guideform"> should contain action="url" where url is the url to which the form is to be submitted.

    Having the wrong doctype is much worse than having no doctype at all. The doctype is supposed to tell the browser what to expect. If the code is not formatted in this way the browser may fall over. If you don't use a doctype you are telling the browser that the mark-up doesn't strictly fall into any category so you would like it to make its best guess possible as to how the page should look.

    If the mark-up doesn't abide by the doctype or there is no doctype the browser needs to use its psychic abilities to work out what the designer was hoping for.
    Last edited by bokeh; 11-11-2005 at 05:59 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
HTML5 Development Center



Recent Articles