I totally agree with what you are saying Steve.
Having a signature that redirects members to other sites is definitely a No-No !
But an animated signature of a username placed at the bottom of a post is totally harmless.
The point here in issue is, why can't the members be told the minimum number of posts that has to be made
before they maybe allowed to have a signature.
Spamming signatures I would not allow even if a mamber has made numerous posts, or has been a member
since the beginning of time.
Cheers .... I wish you a good day.
Steve R Jones;1292987 wrote:
It has more to do with spammers and or people who's sole intention is to post junk for the sake of getting signatures to advertise their own interests.